MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970036136 · doi:10.1139/v01-048

Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization, and structural studies of new Cu(I) and Cu(II) complexes containing organophosphorus ligands, and crystal structures of (Ph<sub>3</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>Cu[S<sub>2</sub>PMe<sub>2</sub>], (Ph<sub>3</sub>P)<sub>2</sub>Cu[(OPPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>N], Cu[(OPPh<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>, and Cu[(OPPh<sub>2</sub>)(SPPh<sub>2</sub>)N]<sub>2</sub>

2001· article· en· W1970036136 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anca Silvestru, A. Rotar, John E. Drake, Michael B. Hursthouse, Mark E. Light, S.I. Fǎrcaş, Roland Rösler, Cristian Silvestru

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTriclinic crystal systemChemistryOrthorhombic crystal systemCrystallographyDenticityCrystal structureMoleculeStereochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cu(I) complexes, (Ph 3 P) 2 CuL (L = [S 2 PMe 2 ] - , [OSPR 2 ] - (R = Me, Ph), [(XPR 2 )(YPR' 2 )N] - (X, Y, R, R' = O, O, Ph, Ph; O, S, Ph, Ph; O, S, OEt, Ph; S, S, Me, Me)) and Cu(II) complexes, CuL 2 (L = [(XPR 2 )(YPR' 2 )N] - (X, Y, R, R' = O, O, Ph, Ph; O, S, Ph, Ph)), have been prepared. The Cu(I) derivatives were characterized by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and in two cases by X-ray crystallography. (Ph 3 P) 2 Cu[S 2 PMe 2 ] (1) crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P2 1 2 1 2 1 (No. 19) with cell parameters a = 9.782(2), b = 17.808(4), c = 20.216(4) Å, V = 3521(6) Å 3 and Z = 4, and (Ph 3 P) 2 Cu[(OPPh 2 ) 2 N] (4) in the triclinic space group P[Formula: see text] (No. 2) with cell parameters a = 9.8079(2), b = 12.9141(3), c = 22.5666(5) Å, α = 75.714(2), β = 79.465(2), γ = 68.2770(8)°, V = 2559.9(1) Å 3 and Z = 2. In both cases the phosphorus ligands are bidentate, thus resulting in monomeric molecules that contain tetrahedral CuP 2 S 2 and CuP 2 O 2 cores. The molecular structures of two of the Cu(II) derivatives were also determined. Cu[(OPPh 2 ) 2 N] 2 (8) and Cu[(OPPh 2 )(SPPh 2 )N] 2 (9) crystallize in the triclinic space group P[Formula: see text] (No. 2) with cell parameters a = 8.887(2), b = 10.739(2), c = 12.477(3) Å, α = 77.61(3), β = 76.15(5), γ = 79.46(3)°, V = 1118.3(4) Å 3 and Z = 1 for 8, and a = 9.626(2), b = 14.151(3), c = 24.752(5) Å, α = 88.23(3), β = 79.93(3), γ = 89.77(3)°, V = 3181(1) Å 3 and Z = 3 for 9. The molecule of Cu[(OPPh 2 ) 2 N] 2 (8) has a planar CuO 4 core, while in Cu[(OPPh 2 )(SPPh 2 )N] 2 (9) both planar and tetrahedral copper cores are observed in a ratio of 1:2.Key words: structure, copper, thiophosphinates, oxo- and thio-imidodiphosphinates

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0220.024
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0260.009
Bibliometrics0.0100.015
Science and technology studies0.0120.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0130.007
Research integrity0.0120.018
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicOrganometallic Complex Synthesis and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207