MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970070132 · doi:10.7202/014326ar

‘Congenial with the Night’: The Sublime and Byron’s Tragedies

2006· article· fr· W1970070132 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yoshie Kimura

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue de l’Université de Moncton · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtSublimePhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article fait valoir que le sentiment du sublime joue un rôle quasi-dramatique dans les tragédies de Byron, et surtout dans Marino Faliero et Sardanapalus. Marino Faliero est une pièce axée sur une injure subie par Marino dans sa vie familiale qui pousse le Doge à participer à la Révolution et ce, dans un temps et un lieu bien précis. La pièce montre également une conscience aiguë de la position élémentaire et sublime de Venise dans le cosmos qui forme une sorte d’arrière-trame à l’action locale. Cet arrière-plan sublime relativise et exalte l’action de la pièce. Nous prêterons une attention particulière au monologue de Lioni au début de l’acte IV et à la malédiction prophétique proférée par Marino contre Venise à la conclusion de la pièce. Pour poursuivre cet argument, Sardanapalus présente un roi qui évite délibérément tout sentiment du sublime associé à la vie d’une nation. Or, à la conclusion de l’intrigue, lorsque ce dernier s’enlève dramatiquement la vie, il déclare comme Manfred qu’il est « on the brink » et qu’il sent « an inward shrinking ». Ainsi, on voit qu’il s’aventure vers l’Abysse et qu’il accepte de vivre un rapport sublime à l’histoire qu’il transcende.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0150.022
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.140
Teacher spread0.135 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue de l’Université de MonctonSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207