STRESS RELAXATION BEHAVIOR OF MICROWAVE‐VACUUM‐DRIED ALGINATE GELS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Swelling of alginate polymer matrix in water involves a build up of network pressure due to an elastic extension of the polymeric matrix. When this network pressure undergoes relaxation by means of dehydration, shrinkage may take place. Three different types of wet alginate gels were prepared and dried using microwave‐vacuum‐drying technique. Dried alginate gel solids had a porous structure. To understand the stress relaxation behavior of alginate gel‐based porous solid structures, uniaxial compressive relaxation studies were performed at selected strain rates, preloads and relaxation times Experimental relaxation curves were normalized and fitted to an empirical relationship, and relaxation behavior was explained. Stress relaxation data were also fitted to another empirical model. All three types of gels had similar elastic components. At lower strain rate, all samples had more resistance to elastic deformation. Stress relaxation information of the dried gel was related to its microstructure. Type 2 gel had more stiffness than type 1 and type 3 gels. The mechanism involved in stress relaxation was entanglement coupling of larger polymer chains in covalently cross‐linked alginate gels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".