MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970138534 · doi:10.1017/s096553950800226x

IS SHOULDER DYSTOCIA WITH BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY PREVENTABLE?

2008· article· en· W1970138534 on OpenAlexaff
Emily Hamilton, Antonio Ciampi, Alina Dyachenko, Henry Lerner, Louise Miner, Herbert F. Sandmire

Bibliographic record

VenueFetal and Maternal Medicine Review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Canadian institutionsJewish General HospitalSt Mary's Hospital CentreMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoulder dystociaMedicineBrachial plexus injuryBrachial plexusBirth injuryPhysical therapyPregnancySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sequelae of shoulder dystocia with persistent brachial plexus injury (BPI) are among the most serious of obstetrical complications. Shoulder dystocia with BPI generally places second or third in the list of the top causes of permanent birth-related neonatal injuries. Apart from the devastating medical and social consequences of lifelong impairment for the family, ensuing litigation with its allegations regarding poor care exacts a heavy toll on the medical profession.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFetal and Maternal Medicine ReviewSame topicCardiovascular Issues in PregnancyFrench-language works237,207