Vascular Access in the Hemodialysis Patient – Personal Experience and Review of the Literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is consensus that arteriovenous (AV) fistulae represent the best choice for initial vascular access in patients suffering from chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) approaching the need of initiating hemodialysis therapy. However, this is a challenging task in the rapidly growing population of diabetic, aged, and hypertensive patients. The preexisting damage of the vascular anatomy and the high cardiovascular comorbidity hinder construction of a well functioning arteriovenous fistula. Late referrals to the nephrologist delay access surgery and increase the use of temporary and cuffed tunneled catheters with all their potential risks. Nevertheless, various strategies and tools exist to overcome these problems. Early referral results in venous preservation and early selection of side, site, and type of initial vascular access. Ultrasound findings are essential components of preoperative investigations. Special attention should be paid to the quality of the arteries at each section along the forearm, the elbow region, and the upper arm. Dedicated, meticulous surgery is mandatory. Fistula monitoring and elective revision of the failing AV fistula will result in increasing longevity of the blood access, and will reduce morbidity and costs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".