MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970149293 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m704592200

Identification of Disulfide-linked Dimers of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinase DDR1

2007· article· en· W1970149293 on OpenAlexaff
Rahim Abdulhussein, Diana H.H. Koo, Wolfgang F. Vogel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDDR1Discoidin domainReceptor tyrosine kinaseReceptor Protein-Tyrosine KinasesTyrosine kinaseBiologyCell biologyPlatelet-derived growth factor receptorTransmembrane domainProtein kinase domainChemistrySignal transductionBiochemistryReceptorMutantGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Discoidin domain receptor 1 (DDR1) is a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase activated by triple-helical collagen. So far six different isoforms of DDR1 have been described. Aberrant expression and signaling of DDR1 have been implicated in several human diseases linked to accelerated matrix degradation and remodeling, including tumor invasion, atherosclerosis, and lung fibrosis. Here we show that DDR1 exists as a disulfide-linked dimer in transfected as well as endogenously expressing cells. This dimer formation occurred irrespective of its kinase domain, as dimers were also found for the truncated DDR1d isoform. A deletion analysis of the extracellular domain showed that DDR1 mutants lacking the stalk region failed to form dimers, whereas deletion of the discoidin domain did not prevent dimerization. Point mutagenesis within the stalk region suggested that cysteines 303 and 348 are necessary for dimerization, collagen binding, and activation of kinase function. The identification of DDR1 dimers provides new insights into the molecular structure of receptor tyrosine kinases and suggests distinct signaling mechanisms of each receptor subfamily.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207