MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970195269 · doi:10.1142/s0219633608004374

ANALYTICAL TREATMENT OF NUCLEAR MAGNETIC SHIELDING TENSOR INTEGRALS OVER EXPONENTIAL-TYPE FUNCTIONS

2008· article· en· W1970195269 on OpenAlexafffund
Lilian Berlu, Hassan Safouhi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Theoretical and Computational Chemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical functions and polynomials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectromagnetic shieldingSlater integralsOrder of integration (calculus)Fourier transformTrigonometric integralTensor (intrinsic definition)Operator (biology)PhysicsMathematical analysisExponential functionMathematicsPure mathematicsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present work concerns the analytical and numerical development of three-center molecular integrals over Slater-type functions (STFs) and B functions of the second order involving [Formula: see text] in the operator. These integrals appear in the analytic expression of the nuclear magnetic shielding tensor. The basis set of STFs is used to represent atomic orbitals. These STFs are expressed in terms of B functions, which are better suited to apply the Fourier transform method thoroughly developed by Steinborn group. Analytic expressions are obtained for the integrals of the second order involved in nuclear magnetic resonance shielding tensor over B functions. These expressions turned out to be similar to those obtained for the usual molecular multi-center integrals. Consequently, the numerical evaluation of the integrals under consideration will benefit from the work previously done on the molecular multi-center integrals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Theoretical and Computational ChemistrySame topicMathematical functions and polynomialsFrench-language works237,207