VPAC1 is a cellular neuroendocrine receptor expressed on T cells that actively facilitates productive HIV-1 infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A lack of productive HIV-1 infection of Kit225 compared to Jurkat T cells, despite similar levels of CD4 and HIV-1 chemokine co-receptors, was found to correlate with the expression of vasoactive intestinal peptide/pituitary adenylate cyclase activating polypeptide receptor-1 (VPAC1). We therefore examined a role for this seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled neuroendocrine receptor in modulating HIV-1 infection. METHODS: Reverse transcription-PCR was used to show the level of VPAC1 expression in different T-cell lines. A signal-blocking antibody to VPAC1 was used to examine its inhibiting effect on HIV-1 infection. Transfection of VPAC1 cDNA in both sense and anti-sense orientation was used to assess the role of VPAC1 in HIV-1 infection. HIV-1 infection was monitored by gag p24 ELISA using HIV-1IIIB or by luciferase activity using pseudo envelope-typed HXB2-NL4-3-luciferase. Analysis of HIV-1 gag DNA and 2-LTR circles was utilized to examine a possible mechanism for the effect of VPAC1. RESULTS: Using VPAC1 signal blocking antibody, we showed that up to 80% of productive infection with HIV-1IIIB was inhibited. We also demonstrated that HIV-1 gp120 has sequence similarity to the natural ligand for VPAC1 and postulate that it can activate this receptor directly. Transfection of VPAC1 cDNA in the anti-sense orientation resulted in a significant loss, up to 50% of productive infection. In contrast, transfection of cells with VPAC1 in the sense orientation increased the productive infection by more than 15-fold and caused a profound increase in syncytium formation. Furthermore, stimulation of VPAC1 on primary cells facilitated in vitro infection with HIV-1 HXB2-NL4-3. Analysis of HIV-1 gag DNA indicated that VPAC1 does not affect viral entry; however, cells that show negligible expression of VPAC1 may not be productively infected as indicated by a lack of 2-LTR circle formation. CONCLUSION: We have discovered a cellular receptor, VPAC1, that is a novel and potent facilitator of HIV-1 infection and thus, is a potentially important new target for therapeutic intervention.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".