MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970253300 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v7n3p123

Macroeconomic Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Sierra Leone: An Empirical Analysis

2015· article· en· W1970253300 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brima Sesay

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSierra leoneOpenness to experienceEconomicsForeign direct investmentUnit root testError correction modelInflation (cosmology)Unit rootOrdinary least squaresExchange rateShort runMonetary economicsCointegrationMacroeconomicsEconometricsDevelopment economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study presents an empirical investigation into the macroeconomic determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Sierra Leone between 1990 and 2013 in both the long and the short run. The Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) estimation is used and the time series properties of the variables were examined in the process. It first tests for unit root using the Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test. The Johansen co-integration technique was employed to derive the long-run relationship. The result shows that market size, openness, exchange rate and natural resource availability exert positive relationship with FDI while inflation and money supply exert a negative one. The short run error correction model was also employed and reveals that market size, economy openness, inflation and natural resource availability are the main determinants of FDI inflow to Sierra Leone. Policy recommendation calls for the expansion of the country’s GDP, government strengthening the implementation of its reform agenda, strengthening its monetary policy to curtail inflation, and to embark on more infrastructural development all of which have the potential to attract more FDI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207