MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970259930 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450830227

Multivariable Optimal Learning Control of Wafer Temperatures in a Commercial RTP Equipment

2008· article· en· W1970259930 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Moon K. Cho, S. Joo, Seung Hwan Won, Kwang‐Sik Lee

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariable calculusMaterials scienceTemperature controlWaferModel predictive controlComputer scienceOptoelectronicsMechanical engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceControl engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A multivariable optimal iterative learning control technique called BMPC (Batch Model Predictive Control) has been implemented and evaluated in a commercial RTP (Rapid Thermal Processing) system fabricating 200 mm silicon wafers. The wafer temperature was controlled at multiple points along the radial direction by manipulating multiple tungsten-halogen lamp groups. The study has addressed the following two issues: feasibility of BMPC in a commercial RTP equipment and enhancement of temperature uniformity using redundant inputs. As a consequence, satisfactory tracking performance could be realized with BMPC with reduced efforts for design and implementation of the controller by the standardized identification and tuning procedure. Redundant inputs whose number is larger than that of the temperature measurements was attempted to relieve the directionality of the system. Experimental tests revealed that the approach can provide us with improved temperature uniformity as well as tracking performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207