Mechanical properties and deformation mechanisms in high thermal resistant poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) under static tension and Izod impact
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Deformation mechanisms in a high thermal resistant poly(acrylonitrile‐butadiene‐styrene) (ABS) were investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS). The work followed our previous study, in which TEM was used for the craze observation and SAXS for the shear yielding, to evaluate the relationship between the mechanical properties and the deformation mechanisms of the ABS under static tension and Izod impact. The current results support our previous conclusion that the combination of TEM and SAXS enables us to identify the deformation mechanisms in the ABS, and provide new evidence for the coexistence of crazing and shear yielding. The SAXS patterns suggest that shear yielding occurred in the ABS, even under the impact loading. We concluded from the study that the occurrence of shear yielding had a major effect on the toughness enhancement of the ABS. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 85: 17–24, 2002
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".