MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970344759 · doi:10.1063/1.1610233

Fokker–Planck approach to extending the one-flux method of carrier transport in semiconductors to variable energies

2003· article· en· W1970344759 on OpenAlexaff
W. R. McKinnon

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlux (metallurgy)PhysicsBoltzmann equationFokker–Planck equationLimit (mathematics)Field (mathematics)Boltzmann constantStatistical physicsPlanckEnergy fluxVariable (mathematics)Quantum electrodynamicsComputational physicsQuantum mechanicsDifferential equationMathematical analysisChemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The one-flux method of McKelvey, Longini, and Brody [Phys. Rev. 123, 51 (1961)] is extended to arbitrary distributions of the fluxes in energy, based on a Fokker–Planck approach to the Boltzmann equation. The method is used to discuss the backscattering of carriers from a high-field region. It is shown that a key result of the one-flux method, that the backscattering vanishes in the limit of high fields, holds more generally than under the assumptions of the one-flux method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.642
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicAdvancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207