Neurotrophins differentially enhance acetylcholine release, acetylcholine content and choline acetyltransferase activity in basal forebrain neurons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several lines of evidence indicate that nerve growth factor is important for the development and maintenance of the basal forebrain cholinergic phenotype. In the present study, using rat primary embryonic basal forebrain cultures, we demonstrate the differential regulation of functional cholinergic markers by nerve growth factor treatment (24--96 h). Following a 96-h treatment, nerve growth factor (1--100 ng/mL) increased choline acetyltransferase activity (168--339% of control), acetylcholine content (141--185%), as well as constitutive (148--283%) and K(+)-stimulated (162--399%) acetylcholine release, but increased release was not accompanied by increased high-affinity choline uptake. Enhancement of ACh release was attenuated by vesamicol (1 microM), suggesting a vesicular source, and was abolished under choline-free conditions, emphasizing the importance of extracellular choline as the primary source for acetylcholine synthesized for release. A greater proportion of acetylcholine released from nerve growth factor-treated cultures than from nerve growth factor-naïve cultures was blocked by voltage-gated Ca(2+) channel antagonists, suggesting that nerve growth factor modified this parameter of neurotransmitter release. Cotreatment of NGF (20 ng/mL) with K252a (200 nM) abolished increases in ChAT activity and prevented enhancement of K(+)-stimulated ACh release beyond the level associated with K252a, suggesting the involvement of TrkA receptor signaling. Also, neurotrophin-3, neurotrophin-4 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (all at 5--200 ng/mL) increased acetylcholine release, although they were not as potent as nerve growth factor and higher concentrations were required. High brain-derived neurotrophic factor concentrations (100 and 200 ng/mL) did, however, increase release to a level similar to nerve growth factor. In summary, long-term exposure (days) of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons to nerve growth factor, and in a less-potent fashion the other neurotrophins, enhanced the release of acetylcholine, which was dependent upon a vesicular pool and the availability of extracellular choline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".