MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970495035 · doi:10.1159/000014431

Plasma Amino Acid Profile on Nocturnal Hemodialysis

2000· article· en· W1970495035 on OpenAlexaff
Dominic S. Raj, Michaelene Ouwendyk, Robert T. Francoeur, Andreas Pierratos

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Purification · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsHumber River Regional HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValineTaurineInternal medicineEndocrinologyPhenylalanineChemistryAmino acidGlutamineHemodialysisIsoleucineUremiaTryptophanTyrosineGlycineLeucineMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of nocturnal hemodialysis (NHD) on serum amino acid (AA) profile. METHODS: In a cross-over trial, we studied the AA profile in 11 patients who were switched from conventional hemodialysis to NHD. Plasma levels of AA were measured at monthly intervals for a period of 1 year. RESULTS: Concentrations of AA isoleucine, threonine, phenylalanine, valine, glycine, glutamine and taurine increased on switch to NHD. Total AA (2,907.2 +/- 542.2 vs. 3,870.2 +/- 715.2 micromol/l, p = 0.03), essential AA (EAA, 842.2 +/- 259.4 vs. 1,125. 8 +/- 235.3 micromol/l, p = 0.03), nonessential AA (NEAA, 2,307.2 +/- 399.1 vs. 2,879.5 +/- 581.2 micromol/l, p = 0.03), and branched chain AA (315.5 +/- 90.8 vs. 386.0 +/- 114.3 micromol/l, p = 0.05) concentrations were significantly higher on NHD. However, abnormalities in the ratios of EAA/NEAA, valine/glycine and tyrosine/phenylalanine persisted during NHD. CONCLUSIONS: NHD alleviated some abnormalities in the aminogram of uremia, but other metabolic derangements lingered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood PurificationSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207