MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970507742 · doi:10.5539/ijb.v6n4p156

Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity of Crude Extracts of Rauvolfia caffra var. caffra (Apocynaceae) From Tanzania

2014· article· en· W1970507742 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Efrem-Fred A. Njau, Jane Alcorn, Patrick Alois Ndakidemi, Manuel Chirino‐Trejo, Joram Buza

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Biology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNelson Mandela African Institution of Science and TechnologyTanzania Commission for Science and TechnologyNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyCanadian Bureau for International Education
KeywordsDPPHApocynaceaeAntimicrobialAgar diffusion testEnterococcus faecalisTraditional medicineMinimum inhibitory concentrationChemistryAgarAntibacterial activityMinimum bactericidal concentrationFood scienceStaphylococcus aureusBiologyAntioxidantBacteriaMicrobiologyMedicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As part of an effort to search for extracts and compounds with new antimicrobial efficacy to fight against bacterial resistance, the antibacterial activity of Rauvolfia caffra var. caffra (Sond.), a plant of family Apocynaceae used in Traditional Medicine in Tanzania, was investigated. Ethanol, methanol and water extracts from leaf, stem and root barks were tested against three species of bacteria namely Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) (Gram -ve), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) (Gram +ve) and Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 51299) (Gram +ve) using Agar-well diffusion assay method and minimum inhibitory concentration on Mueller-Hinton Agar plates. The extracting solvents were removed by vacuo evaporator to obtain gummy-like extracts. This was then dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (10% DMSO). The DMSO without plant extracts was used as a negative control whereas Gentamicin® as the standard antibiotic was used as a positive control. The Zone of Inhibition (ZOI) measured in mm and Relative Inhibitory Zone Diameter (RIZD) was calculated. Results showed that R. caffra exhibited antimicrobial inhibitory activity at a range of 1.25 to 5.0 mg/ml with activity most prominent with methanol extract (ZOI of 28.33± 0.33 mm and RIZD of 95% for S. aureus; and ZOI of 26.66 ± 0.33 mm for E.coli and 19.0 ± 0.57 mm for E. faecalis at P< 0.05). To characterize further, the alkaloid from the root bark was extracted according to the standard procedure. The antioxidant activity of the alkaloids and ethanolic extracts was determined using 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and reducing capacity assays. The results indicated that alkaloid fraction of the root and 80% ethanolic extracts of stem bark exhibited high antioxidant activity. The phytochemical analysis indicated that R. caffra is rich in alkaloids, anthraquinones, anthocyanoides, flavonoids, saponins, tannis and reducing sugars. This study provides supportive evidence that methanol and ethanol extracts of R. caffra can be used as herbal medicine in control of E.coli, S. aureus and E. faecalis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.781
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of BiologySame topicEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants StudiesFrench-language works237,207