MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970531810 · doi:10.1055/s-0032-1319884

Can Stem Cells Home to the Injured Intervertebral Disk Via Intravenous Infusion? A Murine Model

2012· article· en· W1970531810 on OpenAlexaff
Vivian Tam, Ian M. Rogers, Danny Chan, Kmc Cheung

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Spine Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStem cellMesenchymal stem cellSpinal cord injuryHoming (biology)PopulationUmbilical cordStem-cell therapyPathologySurgerySpinal cordAnatomyCell biologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Patients who suffer traumatic injury of the spine can also present with intervertebral disk injury, both of which are associated with low back pain (LBP). While conventional treatments mainly serve to alleviate pain, these treatments are not biological. Various biological therapies such as growth hormones/factors and cells have been studied for treatment of different conditions including that of IVD degeneration, which is also associated with LBP. In various animal models, such biological therapies have been demonstrated to slow or even reverse degeneration. 1,2 The use of stem cells to treat injury is very promising due to their ability to regenerate and differentiate into other cell types—thus lies their potential to repair tissue damage. Of great interest is a population of cord-blood stem cells with expanded multipotency and mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-like properties. 3 These cells are reported to home to injured sites after intravenous (IV) injection and are demonstrated in a rat spinal cord injury model to induce beneficial effects to injured rats. 4 The use of such homing stem cells is advantageous as this could potentially bypass invasive surgery. We investigated the potential of these stem cells to aid IVD repair by determining (1) if these cells could home to injured IVD after intravenous infusion and (2) induce any beneficial effects on the morphology of the injured IVD using a murine model of IVD disk injury. Materials and Methods Stem cells were isolated from human umbilical cord blood as previously reported. 3 Animal ethics was approved by the CULATR at the University of HK, and NOD/SCID mice aged 6–8 weeks (5/group) were used. Mice were anaesthetized and X-rayed to identify the caudal disk levels to be punctured and unpunctured controls. A 31G needle was used to perpendicularly puncture disks, the wounds were sutured and mice underwent standard postoperative procedures. On the day of puncture or 1 week postpuncture, cells were thawed and resuspended in DMEM and injected via the tail vein (10E6). IVDs were harvested at 7 days or 1 month postcell injection and processed for histology. IVD morphology was visualized with the FAST staining method. 5 Stem cells were tracked by staining for antihuman mitochondrial antibodies. Results From the FAST staining, the IVD morphology was disrupted after puncture of the disk with a large loss of cells from the NP and the loss of the AF/NP border (Figs. 1 and 2). Little difference in morphology of the disks were observed between groups with cells injected versus no cells injected after 1 month (Fig. 2), however, both yielded similar staining intensity of the NP matrix. Immunostaining for the stem cells indicated that few cells migrated to the punctured disk. In the sections that did yield cells, they were usually single cells and found in the growth plate area or adjacent to the EP blood vessels, but not in the NP or AF. Cells were also found in adjacent unpunctured disks, and also in other organs including the spleen and lungs. Conclusion The intravenous introduction of the stem cells did not arrest degeneration nor regenerate the IVD after 1 month. Few cells were found to be located at the sites of puncture, and of the cells that were found, these were limited to the growth plate area or vessels around the end plate, but not in the NP or AF. It is possible that the little change in morphology of the IVD, after 1 month of injury and intravenous introduction of the stem cells, was due to the fact that few cells were able to migrate to the injured disk. This may have been caused by a number of factors including: (1) the homing signal that was not sufficient to attract the stem cells to the injured site, (2) the avascular nature of the IVD which further limited cell penetration to the injured site, and (3) that the cells lodged in other organs such as the lungs and spleen. Ongoing studies are being carried out to quantitatively determine any localized changes to the IVD including proteoglycan and gene expression levels. This work is supported by the Seed Funding Programme for Basic Research, The University of Hong Kong. I confirm having declared any potential conflict of interest for all authors listed on this abstract No Disclosure of Interest None declared Ho G, et al. Connective Tissue Research 2008;49(1):15–21 Yang F, et al. Molecular Therapy 2009;17(11):1959–1966 Rogers I, et al. Experimental Cell Research 2007;313(9):1839–1852 Chua SJ, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010;35(16):1520–1526 Leung VY, et al. Journal of Histochemical Cytochemistry 2009;57(3):249–256

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Spine JournalSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207