MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970534643 · doi:10.1086/423292

H<scp>i</scp>Observations of the Local Group Dwarf WLM

2004· article· en· W1970534643 on OpenAlexaff
D. C. Jackson, Evan D. Skillman, John M. Cannon, Stéphanie Côté

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsLocal GroupDwarf galaxyGalaxyGalaxy rotation curveRADIUSIrregular galaxyFlux (metallurgy)AstronomyExtinction (optical mineralogy)Galaxy groupTelescopeGalaxy formation and evolutionInteracting galaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present Australia Telescope Compact Array mosaic H I imaging of the Local Group dwarf irregular galaxy WLM. We find an integrated flux of 149 Jy km s -1 and a total H I mass of (3.2 ± 0.3) × 10 7 M ⊙ . The major axis of the H I is aligned with the stellar component of the galaxy. The overall H I distribution is relatively smooth at our resolution and has a double-peaked central core. One of these peaks is aligned with a region found to have extinction that is internal to WLM, and we take this as possible evidence of a large molecular gas complex in the southern half of the galaxy. The other H I peak is in close proximity to the brightest H II regions. WLM's overall velocity field is consistent with rigid-body rotation. A rotation curve is derived, and we find a total dynamical mass of (3.00 ± 0.80) × 10 8 M ⊙ . We also performed a wide-field search, 38' in radius, for H I companions or evidence of recent interactions (e.g., tidal tails) and found no detections to an H I mass limit of M H I > 8.4 × 10 5 M ⊙ .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.644

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1930.061

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207