MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970563076

The Prevention of Future Conflict in Iraq: Policy Research at DFAIT - A Case Study

2008· article· en· W1970563076 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ben Rowswell, David M. Malone

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWeber, Simmel, Sociological Theory
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChristian ministryMinistry of Foreign AffairsPolitical scienceForeign policyPublic administrationCorporate governanceInternational relationsInternational conflictLawManagementPoliticsEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses a policy research project on possible future economic, governance and constitutional arrangements for Iraq that brought together a number of Iraqi and international practitioners and scholars at the Canadian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Trade in 2006, highlighting some conclusions eventually also reflected in a volume, Iraq: Preventing a New Generation of Conflict, edited by Markus E. Bouillon, David M. Malone and Ben Rowswell (London and Boulder CA: Lynne Rienner, 2007). It also discusses policy research sometimes incubated within and sometimes supported beyond Canada's foreign ministry (and other such institutions).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.443
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicWeber, Simmel, Sociological TheoryFrench-language works237,207