History of knee surgery is associated with higher prevalence of neuropathic pain-like symptoms in patients with severe osteoarthritis of the knee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Neuropathic pain (NP) mechanisms contribute to the pain experience in osteoarthritis (OA). We aimed to characterise the factors that contribute to NP-like symptoms in knee OA patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 139 patients with knee OA were recruited from secondary care, and completed a nurse- administered PainDetect questionnaire (PD-Q ), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain intensity, and the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC). Cases with any previous history of total joint replacement were excluded. RESULTS: Almost 75% of patients had non-zero PD-Q scores, and 34% had PD-Q scores corresponding to possible NP. No association was seen between PD-Q scores and duration of symptoms, gender, and radiographic severity. Possible NP was strongly associated (p < 1 × 10(-3)) with worse quality of life scores, worse sleep scores, higher pain intensity, worse WOMAC pain, stiffness and function scores. A history of previous knee surgery (arthroscopy, ligament repair or meniscectomy) was strongly associated with possible NP (odds ratio [OR] = 6.86; 95% CI = 1.78-26.43; p < 0.005). This association remained statistically significant after adjustment for pain intensity (OR = 6.37; 95% CI = 1.55-26.11; p < 0.010) whereas an association between history of knee surgery and the other measures of pain was found to be mediated by PD-Q scores. CONCLUSIONS: NP-like symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with clinically severe painful OA and are a significant contributor to decreased quality of life and higher pain intensity. The cross-sectional association with previous history of knee surgery suggests that some of the NP-like symptoms may result from nerve damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".