MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970596371 · doi:10.1109/tcsi.2006.888675

Fully Integrated High-Voltage Front-End Interface for Ultrasonic Sensing Applications

2007· article· en· W1970596371 on OpenAlexaff
R. Chebli, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplifierElectrical engineeringVoltageFront and back endsVoltage doublerElectronic engineeringTransducerEngineeringHigh voltagePulse generatorUltrasonic sensorVoltage sourceCMOSAcousticsDropout voltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper concerns the design and implementation of a fully integrated high-voltage (HV) front-end transducer for ultrasonic sensing applications. This includes a programmable HV dc-dc converter (HVDC), a drive amplifier, and a tuneable pulse generator. The HVDC is based on a multistage two-phase voltage doubler and static level up shifters. The drive amplifier is composed of a static level-up stage and a Class-D switching output stage. Post-layout simulation and experimental silicon results are reported for two HVDC stages and a drive amplifier, which were fabricated using a 0.8-mum CMOS/DMOS process and having a supply voltage of 5 V/400 V. The measurement results confirm the validation of the HV circuit implementation and its design optimization. An output voltage of up to 200 V was obtained from the HVDC. Also, the drive amplifier generates spikes up to 148 V, with rise and fall times of 69 and 58 ns, respectively. The peak current flowing through the transducer element can be as high as 200 mA

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Fundamental Theory and ApplicationsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207