MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970600054 · doi:10.1103/physreve.62.r1501

Undulated blistering during thin film delamination

2000· article· en· W1970600054 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Thin Films
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotropyMaterials scienceElasticity (physics)Delamination (geology)InstabilityScalingTension (geology)Composite materialScaling lawThin filmCondensed matter physicsMechanicsOpticsPhysicsUltimate tensile strengthNanotechnologyGeometryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the delamination of a compressed thin film from a solid substrate with continuum elasticity theory. Our model enables one to describe the advance of an undulated blister. It is shown that an elastic tension between the inner fold and the boundary of a blister is at the origin of the undulations. In addition, the essential experimental observations and recent simulations are reproduced very well: (i) Above a strain threshold, straight blister growth is unstable and starts to undulate. (ii) It is found that the period of the undulations scales with epsilon(*-1/2), where epsilon(*) is the isotropic compressive strain of the film. (iii) Similar periodic corrections to this power law scaling are recovered and are found to be associated with a growth instability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it