MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970633958 · doi:10.1139/p00-064

On the concept of kinetic energy

2000· article· en· W1970633958 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Adel F. Antippa

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicExperimental and Theoretical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKinetic energyPhysicsScalar (mathematics)Classical mechanicsEnergy (signal processing)Theoretical physicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze, in their historic perspective, the three alternative traditional definitions of kinetic energy and then propose a new definition according to which the change in kinetic energy is equal to the scalar product of the velocity and the change in momentum. We justify this definition on conceptual grounds, and show that it follows from Hamilton's equations. From this definition, the explicit classical and relativistic expressions for kinetic energy follow simply upon using the appropriate mass function. The definition given here has the added advantage of being naturally generalizable to a canonical kinetic energy per degree of freedom. This latter takes into account both particle and field kinetic energies. PACS Nos.: 01.55+b, 03.30+p, 03.20+i, 46.10+z

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207