MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1970635612 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2012.6350653

Multi-frequency analysis of high resolution quad-pol Radarsat-2 and dual-pol TerraSAR-X data for land cover classification in Arctic Coastal Ecosystems, Mackenzie Delta, beaufort sea

2012· article· en· W1970635612 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Banks, Tobias Ullmann, Jason Duffe, Achim Roth, Douglas J. King, Anne M. Demers, Anna E. Hogg, Andreas Schmitt, Roland Baumhauer, Stefan Dech

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShoreLand coverArcticEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingEnvironmental resource managementLand usePhysical geographyOceanographyGeographyEcologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the potential for greater human presence and increased development of natural resources including oil and gas, culturally and biologically sensitive shorelines in the Arctic may face increasing risk of environmental emergencies. Establishing response contingency plans may reduce impacts, and are particularly beneficial in this region because accessibility is limited and environmental conditions are harsh. This study will assess the potential for automated classification of Arctic shore and near shore land cover types using polarimetric Radarsat-2 and TerraSAR-X imagery. Results will contribute to the improvement and in some cases the establishment of shoreline sensitivity indices, which could help responders prioritize protection along the most sensitive shorelines in the event of an environmental emergency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.065

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→