Portrait des activités délinquantes et de l’usage de substances psychoactives chez des jeunes consultant un centre de réadaptation pour personnes alcooliques et toxicomanes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Près de 900 jeunes présentant une problématique sévère de toxicomanie ont été évalués lors de leur demande de service en centre spécialisé. Un portrait de leur consommation de substances psychoactives est dressé et comparé en fonction des types d’encadrement judiciaire auquel est soumis l’individu, mais aussi en fonction du sexe. On constate des variations importantes de consommation de drogues entre les groupes (jeunes contrevenants par rapport aux jeunes en situation de protection ou encore, sous aucun encadrement légal) permettant d’appuyer l’hypothèse de liens entre, d’une part, l’intensité et le type de consommation de substances psychoactives et, d’autre part, la gravité des activités délictueuses. On tente d’identifier la portion de délits commis pour des fins de consommation de substances psychoactives et, donc, d’évaluer la proportion de jeunes qui cesseraient probablement les activités délictueuses si on pouvait les aider à cesser cette consommation de drogues. Les différences entre les sexes sont également mises en évidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".