MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970661896 · doi:10.1007/s13404-011-0029-2

Invitation to Gold 2012, Tokyo

2011· article· en· W1970661896 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Haruta

Bibliographic record

VenueGold bulletin · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNanotechnologyColloidal goldGold rushMaterials scienceSubstrate (aquarium)NanoparticleMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The price of gold reached 1891.90 US dollars per ounce during August 2011, suggesting that gold has found a new prominence in global financial markets and economics. An increasing number of people are currently protecting their capital in an asset that offers a safe store of value to today's investor. At the same time, the industrial applications of gold, largely centered on electronics (bonding wires, electroplating, etc.), have been growing and currently occupy around 12% of total gold demand. So a new gold rush is underway at the cutting edge of nanoscience and -technology research. A typical example is catalysis by gold. For over a century, gold in bulk form had been considered too noble to work as a catalyst. However, it has recently been proved that gold exhibits surprisingly high catalytic activity for many reactions when deposited as nanoparticles on base metal oxides, carbons, and polymers. At the same time, gold colloids of different morphology are attracting growing interest owing to their special surface plasmonics; applications in DNA diagnosis, health care, and new paints are on the horizon. Coulomb blockade by quantum dots may present a new topic in electronics. Self-assembled monolayers on a substrate of gold are also an interesting area of research which functionalizes solid surfaces leading to catalysis, electrodes, and optoelectronics. These are just a part of the expanding science and technology of gold. Plenty of exciting discoveries and achievements are still emerging in other areas too, for example unexpected magnetism in gold nanostructures. To discuss and debate this rapid growth of gold science and technology, the Gold 2012 conference will be held at one of the biggest terminals in the center of Tokyo, Shinjuku. Participants will enjoy a magnificent view from the 42nd and 43rd floors of the conference venue, the Keio Plaza Hotel. You are cordially invited to join us for this 6th Gold Conference, the first in Asia, after Heidelberg (2009), Limerick (2006), Vancouver (2003), Cape Town (2001), and Hanau (1996). Japan was once called the island of gold, Zipang, and it is now moving to the island to nanogold. Please join us at Gold 2012 in Tokyo to discuss mutual interests in nanotechnology, chemistry, catalysis, and nanomaterials of gold and its applications (www.gold2012.org) M. Haruta Chairman of the GOLD 2012 Organising Committee

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGold bulletinSame topicAdvanced Nanomaterials in CatalysisFrench-language works237,207