Développement et gouvernement autochtones : l’expérience de la Baie James et du Nord québécois
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’expérience des Cris et des Inuit, régis depuis 1975 par la Convention de la Baie James et du Nord québécois sert à explorer les paramètres empiriques de l’autonomie gouvernementale autochtone. Un bilan succinct de vingt années de changements sociaux (infrastructures, revenus familiaux, gestion bureaucratique et malaises psychosociaux) conclut que le régime de la Convention a confirmé les tendances déjà établies, y compris celles qu’il voulait corriger, et que maints programmes ont eu des effets pervers inattendus. D’après l’auteur, les choix entre valeurs contradictoires ont été éludés à l’origine, et on a négligé les fondements constitutifs de l’autonomie politique : le partage des pouvoirs, la citoyenneté et la représentation parlementaire, la responsabilité fiscale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".