MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1970688426 · doi:10.1109/ahici.2011.6113956

A superposition modulation based cooperative transmission scheme in regenerate-and-forward relaying networks

2011· article· en· W1970688426 on OpenAlexaff
Chia-Yang Chiang, Satish C. Jha, Vijay K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperposition principleTransmission (telecommunications)RelayComputer scienceModulation (music)Scheme (mathematics)Quadrature amplitude modulationTopology (electrical circuits)Bit error rateElectronic engineeringConstellationSpectral efficiencyPower (physics)AlgorithmTelecommunicationsMathematicsChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since classical time-division-multiple-access based cooperative scheme suffers from lower data rate due to two time-slots based transmission approach, superposition modulation has recently gained huge research attention which enables single time-slot cooperative transmission. Therefore, in this paper we propose a novel superposition modulation based regenerate-and-forward cooperative transmission scheme with M-ary phase shift keying constellation signals. Closed-form expressions for average symbol error probability (SEP) and maximum power allocation for relay data are derived for proposed scheme. Simulation results show that proposed scheme outperforms classical cooperative scheme by providing higher spectral efficiency and lower SEP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCooperative Communication and Network Coding→French-language works237,207→