Differential Vulnerability of Inner and Outer Hair Cell Systems to Chronic Mild Hypoxia and Glutamate Ototoxicity: Insights into the Cause of Auditory Neuropathy
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of long-term mild hypoxia and of glutamate poisoning on the functional properties of the cochlea. METHODS: Outer hair cell activity was monitored using otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics, and inner hair cell/cochlear afferent function was measured using neural responses (cochlear action potentials or auditory brainstem responses [ABRs]). RESULTS: In contrast to the effects of acute anoxia, in which all aspects of cochlear function are simultaneously lost, mild, long-term hypoxia results in a clear differential effect on outer versus inner hair cell systems. During a 2-hour period of mild hypoxia, ABR amplitude and threshold deteriorate significantly, whereas outer hair cell function, as reflected by otoacoustic emissions, shows little or no change. A similar dissociation between inner and outer hair cell function is observed during instillation of glutamate (1-10 mM), where the cochlear microphonic and the otoacoustic emissions are unchanged, whereas cochlear action potential amplitudes are reduced. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate a difference in vulnerability of inner and outer hair cell systems. The inner hair cell/cochlear afferent system is vulnerable to long-term, mild hypoxia; this may be an etiologic factor in hearing loss of cochlear origin, particularly in high-risk birth infants with auditory neuropathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it