Differential Vulnerability of Inner and Outer Hair Cell Systems to Chronic Mild Hypoxia and Glutamate Ototoxicity: Insights into the Cause of Auditory Neuropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the effects of long-term mild hypoxia and of glutamate poisoning on the functional properties of the cochlea. METHODS: Outer hair cell activity was monitored using otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics, and inner hair cell/cochlear afferent function was measured using neural responses (cochlear action potentials or auditory brainstem responses [ABRs]). RESULTS: In contrast to the effects of acute anoxia, in which all aspects of cochlear function are simultaneously lost, mild, long-term hypoxia results in a clear differential effect on outer versus inner hair cell systems. During a 2-hour period of mild hypoxia, ABR amplitude and threshold deteriorate significantly, whereas outer hair cell function, as reflected by otoacoustic emissions, shows little or no change. A similar dissociation between inner and outer hair cell function is observed during instillation of glutamate (1-10 mM), where the cochlear microphonic and the otoacoustic emissions are unchanged, whereas cochlear action potential amplitudes are reduced. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate a difference in vulnerability of inner and outer hair cell systems. The inner hair cell/cochlear afferent system is vulnerable to long-term, mild hypoxia; this may be an etiologic factor in hearing loss of cochlear origin, particularly in high-risk birth infants with auditory neuropathy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".