Effect of Endurance Exercise on Hepatic Lipid Content, Enzymes, and Adiposity in Men and Women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Obesity and physical inactivity are independent risk factors for the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We determined the effect of endurance exercise training on hepatic lipid content and hepatic enzyme concentration in men and women. Waist circumference (WC), percent body fat (BF), computed tomography (CT) scans for liver attenuation (inverse relationship with hepatic lipid), bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) plasma concentrations were measured before and after 12 weeks of endurance training in 41 lean and obese men and women. Exercise training did not change liver attenuation, body weight, percent BF, bilirubin, or ALT concentration, but did lower WC (P < 0.0001), and decreased GGT in men only (P = 0.01). Obese subjects had a lower liver attenuation than lean subjects (P = 0.04). Obese women had lower ALT than obese men (P = 0.03). GGT was lower in women before and after training. WC was positively correlated with GGT (r = 0.32, P = 0.003) and ALT (r = 0.320, P = 0.004) and negatively correlated with liver attenuation (r = -0.340, P = 0.03). Percent BF was negatively correlated with bilirubin (r = -0.374, P = 0.005). Liver attenuation was negatively correlated with ALT (r = -0.405, P = 0.003). Short-term endurance training without weight loss does not alter hepatic lipid content. There was a strong relationship between GGT/ALT and body composition (percent BF) as well as between ALT and hepatic lipid content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".