MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970736798 · doi:10.1080/00207541003641879

Consideration of dynamic changes in machine reliability and part demand: a cellular manufacturing systems design model

2010· article· en· W1970736798 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Production Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsCellular manufacturingReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringIndustrial engineeringManufacturing engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In a dynamic manufacturing and marketing environment, machine reliability is often subject to issues of usage and age, with areas like part demand experiencing frequent changes as well. It is vital, therefore, for a manufacturing cell design to consider and plan for such changes so that said design will continue to meet expectations in future applications. This study proposes a multi-objective, integer-programming (IP) model for designing a cellular manufacturing system (CMS) that will remain optimal for the entire multi-period planning horizon by considering dynamic changes in machine reliability and part demand over the periods. This model will allow for alternative part processing routes and select suitable machines along those routes – maximising machine system reliability and minimising system costs. This model also accounts for the purchase of new machine capacity when needed in an effort to design an optimal cell that remains suitable for the entire planning horizon. This study illustrates an -constraint solution procedure that will facilitate the user when selecting suitable solutions based on the importance they impart to the objectives. Keywords: cellular manufacturing systems (CMS)dynamic change in machine reliabilitydynamic parts demandexponential distributionmulti-objective multi-period modelsystem cost and system reliability Acknowledgement The authors would like to express their gratitude to the University of Windsor and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) for the financial support during the tenure of this research project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it