Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article s’appuie sur plusieurs recherches menées au cours des années 1990 dans différents milieux sociaux et culturels à Montréal sur la question des identités ethniques des jeunes issus de l’immigration. Ces divers travaux ont permis de constater que les parents immigrants, les parents en union mixte et ceux qui adoptent à l’étranger formulent des projets spécifiques quant à l’identité ethnique de leur enfant et déploient plusieurs stratégies concrètes à cet effet. Une étude récente que nous menons sur les unions mixtes inclut un échantillon de parents qui ont grandi en milieu ethnique minoritaire à Montréal. Leurs projets identitaires pour leurs enfants sont comparés avec leur propre socialisation et les projets identitaires qu’avaient leurs parents immigrants pour eux. Cet article démontre que les projets identitaires actuels des jeunes parents issus de milieux immigrés se distinguent de ceux des cohortes précédentes à plusieurs égards, notamment en ce qui a trait aux enjeux de la réalité pluraliste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".