MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970767092 · doi:10.1159/000082075

Salt in the Wound: A Possible Role of Na<sup>+</sup> Gradient in Chlamydial Infection

2004· review· en· W1970767092 on OpenAlexaff
Pavel Dibrov, Elena Dibrov, Grant N. Pierce, Michael Y. Galperin

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobial Physiology · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicReproductive tract infections research
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface HospitalUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMolecular biologyBiologyIntracellularChemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genome analysis has revealed the presence of key components of the Na(+) chemiosmotic cycle, including the primary Na(+) pump (Na(+)-translocating NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase), in the cytoplasmic membrane of two ubiquitous human pathogens, Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydiophyla pneumoniae. This observation seemed paradoxical in the case of obligatory intracellular parasites because the Na(+) cycle is thought to be primarily a mechanism that enhances the adaptive potential in free-living bacteria that are often facing drastic changes in the salinity and pH of the environment. We present a model suggesting that operation of the Na(+) cycle may play an important role in the course of chlamydial infection, when the Na(+) and H(+) homeostasis of the host cell become severely impaired. This introduces the intriguing possibility of the application of drugs targeting Na(+)-transporting enzymes to chlamydial infections, which are notoriously difficult to treat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobial PhysiologySame topicReproductive tract infections researchFrench-language works237,207