MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970767514 · doi:10.1109/jsac.2014.2328133

Optimized Backhaul Compression for Uplink Cloud Radio Access Network

2014· article· en· W1970767514 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBackhaul (telecommunications)Telecommunications linkDecodesQuantization (signal processing)Base stationMaximizationArtificial noiseCloud computingDecoding methods

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the uplink of a cloud radio access network (C-RAN) where the cell sites are connected to a cloud-computing-based central processor (CP) with noiseless backhaul links with finite capacities. We employ a simple compress-and-forward scheme in which the base stations (BSs) quantize the received signals and send the quantized signals to the CP using either distributed Wyner-Ziv coding or single-user compression. The CP first decodes the quantization codewords and then decodes the user messages as if the remote users and the cloud center form a virtual multiple-access channel (VMAC). This paper formulates the problem of optimizing the quantization noise levels for weighted sum rate maximization under a sum backhaul capacity constraint. We propose an alternating convex optimization approach to find a local optimum solution to the problem efficiently, and more importantly, to establish that setting the quantization noise levels to be proportional to the background noise levels is near optimal for sum-rate maximization when the signal-to-quantization-noise-ratio (SQNR) is high. In addition, with Wyner-Ziv coding, the approximate quantization noise level is shown to achieve the sum-capacity of the uplink C-RAN model to within a constant gap. With single-user compression, a similar constant-gap result is obtained under a diagonal dominant channel condition. These results lead to an efficient algorithm for allocating the backhaul capacities in C-RAN. The performance of the proposed scheme is evaluated for practical multicell and heterogeneous networks. It is shown that multicell processing with optimized quantization noise levels across the BSs can significantly improve the performance of wireless cellular networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations151
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal on Selected Areas in CommunicationsSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207