MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970769119 · doi:10.1097/jcp.0b013e3182075587

Risk of Low Bone Mineral Density Associated With Psychotropic Medications and Mental Disorders in Postmenopausal Women

2010· article· en· W1970769119 on OpenAlexafffundabout
James M. Bolton, Laura E. Targownik, Stella Leung, Jitender Sareen, William D. Leslie

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAstraZeneca Canada
KeywordsMedicineOdds ratioOsteoporosisInternal medicineConfidence intervalBone mineralDepression (economics)Medical prescriptionPsychiatryPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Independent reports suggest that various psychotropic medications and psychiatric disorders are associated with changes in bone mineral density (BMD). The objective of this study was to clarify the independent effects of a range of mental illnesses and psychotropic medications on BMD among postmenopausal women. METHODS: Women 50 years or older with baseline BMD measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were identified in a database containing all clinical dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry test results for the Province of Manitoba, Canada. Records were linked with population-based administrative health databases to provide detailed information on sociodemographic factors, mental and physical health diagnoses, and prescription medication usage. Osteoporotic cases (n = 6820) were matched on age, sex, and ethnicity to 3 control subjects with normal BMD (n = 20,247). Multivariable conditional logistic regression compared cases and control subjects on diagnosed mental illnesses and use of psychotropic medications. RESULTS: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (adjusted odds ratios, 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-1.69), atypical antipsychotics (AOR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.06-2.28), and benzodiazepines (AOR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.29) were associated with higher risk of osteoporosis. Tricyclic antidepressants were associated with lower odds of osteoporosis (AOR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.49-0.65). These drug effects were independent of mental illness diagnoses including depression (AOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98) and schizophrenia (AOR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.04-3.77). CONCLUSIONS: Some psychotropic medications are associated with an increased risk of osteoporotic BMD, whereas tricyclic antidepressants may be protective against osteoporosis, and these effects are independent of mental illness diagnoses. Clinicians should consider these effects when prescribing psychotropic medications in postmenopausal women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.408 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical PsychopharmacologySame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207