MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970795155 · doi:10.1109/epec.2009.5420959

A case study of PV installation for an urban building in downtown Montreal

2009· article· en· W1970795155 on OpenAlexaffabout
Arbi Gharakhani Siraki, Pragasen Pillay, Sheldon S. Williamson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowntownPhotovoltaic systemBuilding-integrated photovoltaicsRenewable energyArchitectural engineeringProduction (economics)InsolationCivil engineeringComputer scienceEnvironmental economicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, building integrated photovoltaic (BIPV) systems have become more popular due to the increased attention that renewable energy resources have received as well as the decreasing trend of photovoltaic (PV) panel manufacturing costs. Many issues remain for researchers in terms of the proper design for different buildings and especially for urban cases. Considering the importance of these issues, this paper presents an accurate design of a PV system for the specific case of an urban commercial building located in the downtown Montreal. Insolation and shadow analysis have been done by means of novel techniques and investigation of different design scenarios has been performed. Furthermore, energy production levels of each scenario are obtained and for the best scenario, the load energy demand is compared with the PV energy production level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.967

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationFrench-language works237,207