Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans l’entre-deux-guerres, les constructions touristiques se multiplient dans les sites les plus pittoresques des Vosges, provoquant des plaintes de la part des amoureux du paysage.La législation locale avait permis de premières mesures de protection, tandis que la législation française, plus développée, est rapidement introduite en Alsace. Elle prévoit surtout la création d’une commission départementale des Sites, chargée de la protection des paysages.Son rôle est important, car les beaux sites des Vosges sont de plus en plus menacés par l’intérêt grandissant qu’ils suscitent auprès des touristes et des entrepreneurs, et sont en proie à un véritable « mitage ». La commission dispose de nombreux outils et développe une doctrine bien déterminée en matière de protection. Mais ces mesures ont leurs limites, et la commission connaît de nombreuses difficultés à les faire appliquer. Pour tenter d’harmoniser les constructions auxquelles elle ne peut s’opposer, elle organise un concours d’architecture vosgienne afin d’avoir des modèles de chalets à proposer aux nouveaux constructeurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".