ENTROPY SCALING IN ION–ION COLLISIONS AT AGS AND SPS ENERGIES
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analysis of the experimental data on nucleus–nucleus collisions at AGS and SPS energies reveals that entropy produced in a limited and full phase-space increases with increasing beam energy and mass of the colliding nuclei. The analysis of the data and corresponding mixed event samples, carried out by considering the particles emitted in the forward and backward hemispheres separately, indicates the presence of clusterization and correlations amongst the produced particles. It is also observed that the total entropy produced in a limited pseudorapidity bin, when normalized to the maximum rapidity in the center of mass frame, is essentially independent of projectile and target masses as well as beam energy, indicating thereby presence of a kind of entropy scaling. The observed scaling is also nicely reproduced by the Monte Carlo models, AMPT and FRITIOF. Furthermore, results of the analysis of the mixed events reveal that the observed entropy scaling is a distinguishable feature of the data rather than a manifestation of the statistics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it