MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970818505 · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.9

Estimating a System's Mean Time-to-Compromise

2008· article· en· W1970818505 on OpenAlexaff
David John Leversage, E.J. Byres

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Security & Privacy · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInformation and Cyber Security
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompromiseSCADAMetric (unit)Computer scienceInterval (graph theory)Duration (music)State (computer science)State spaceMathematicsAlgorithmStatisticsEngineeringLawOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mean time-to-compromise is a comparative security metric that applies lessons learned from physical security. To address this need in the SCADA world specifically and the corporate IT security world more generally, we propose a mean time-to-compromise (MTTC) interval as an estimate of the time it will take for an attacker with a specific skill level to successfully impact a target system. We also propose a state-space model (SSM) and algorithms for estimating attack paths and state times to calculate these MTTC intervals for a given target system. Although we use SCADA as an example, we believe our approach should work in any IT environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations126
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Security & PrivacySame topicInformation and Cyber SecurityFrench-language works237,207