Dimethyl Sulfoxide Affects the Selection of Splice Sites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depending on the cell lines and cell types, dimethyl sulfoxide (Me2SO) can induce or block cell differentiation and apoptosis. Although Me2SO treatment alters many levels of gene expression, the molecular processes that are directly affected by Me2SO have not been clearly identified. Here, we report that Me2SO affects splice site selection on model pre-mRNAs incubated in a nuclear extract prepared from HeLa cells. A shift toward the proximal pair of splice sites was observed on pre-mRNAs carrying competing 5'-splice sites or competing 3'-splice sites. Because the activity of recombinant hnRNP A1 protein was similar when added to extracts containing or lacking Me2SO, the activity of endogenous A1 proteins is probably not affected by Me2SO. Notably, in a manner reminiscent of SR proteins, Me2SO activated splicing in a HeLa S100 extract. Moreover, the activity of recombinant SR proteins in splice site selection in vitro was improved by Me2SO. Polar solvents like DMF and formamide similarly modulated splice site selection in vitro but formamide did not activate a HeLa S100 extract. We propose that Me2SO improves ionic interactions between splicing factors that contain RS-domains. The direct impact of Me2SO on alternative splicing may explain, at least in part, the different and sometimes opposite effects of Me2SO on cell differentiation and apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".