Décision rendue par le Conseil canadien des relations du travail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saisi de la question de savoir si une personne opérant un comptoir postal était un employé au sens du Code canadien du travail (le Code), le Conseil a examiné de façon différente le test applicable en matière de détermination du statut d'entrepreneur indépendant. Dans ses motifs, le Conseil note qu'en adoptant la définition d'entrepreneur indépendant retrouvée au paragraphe 3(1) du Code, le Parlement a privilégié la notion de dépendance économique comme élément distinctif des statuts d'entrepreneur dépendant et indépendant. Par conséquent, le Conseil, soucieux d'appliquer un test à même de refléter plus fidèlement l'importance attribuée à cet élément-clé, applique de nouveaux critères reliés au contrôle économique tout en mettant l'emphase sur les activités de l'entrepreneur plutôt que sur l'entreprise de l'employeur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.031 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".