MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970856274 · doi:10.1139/f09-053

Bioenrichment of trace elements in a series of ponds near a northern fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis) colony at Cape Vera, Devon Island

2009· article· en· W1970856274 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Samantha Brimble, Jules M. Blais, Linda E. Kimpe, Mark L. Mallory, Bronwyn E. Keatley, Marianne S. V. Douglas, John P. Smol

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMercury impact and mitigation studies
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of OttawaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsGuanoSeabirdTrace elementCapeNutrientWater columnEcologyBiologyArcticOceanographyGeographyGeologyArchaeologyGeochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seabirds are an important link between their marine feeding areas and their terrestrial breeding environments, transporting both marine-derived nutrients and contaminants and then depositing them on land in their guano. In this study, the impact of a large northern fulmar ( Fulmarus glacialis ) colony on the water chemistry of 26 nearby ponds spanning a gradient of seabird influence was investigated at Cape Vera, Devon Island, in the Canadian High Arctic. The presence of the fulmar colony has led to nutrient and trace element enrichment in the ponds, as evidenced by the close association among As, Cd, Co, Cu, Li, Mn, Mo, Ni, Sb, and Sr and the ornithogenic gradient. The ponds most affected by the fulmar colony were characterized by increased primary production, high organic carbon concentrations, and elevated pH — conditions favorable for the in situ removal of metals from the water column. Despite this, the highest trace element concentrations were observed in the seabird-influenced ponds, suggesting that these elements have undergone biotransport.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2009
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicMercury impact and mitigation studiesFrench-language works237,207