MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970858221 · doi:10.1063/1.3077130

A discrete variable representation method for studying the rovibrational quantum dynamics of molecules with more than three atoms

2009· article· en· W1970858221 on OpenAlex
Xiaogang Wang, Tucker Carrington

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRotational–vibrational spectroscopyTriatomic moleculeBasis (linear algebra)Discrete variableVariable (mathematics)Spectral lineBasis functionRepresentation (politics)Quantum numberProduct (mathematics)Direct productPhysicsStatistical physicsQuantum mechanicsComputational chemistryMoleculeComputer scienceChemistryMathematicsApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisDiscrete mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Established multidimensional discrete variable representations (DVRs) are derived from a direct product basis. They are commonly used to compute vibrational spectra and have also been employed to determine rovibrational spectra of triatomic molecules. We show that for J>0 calculations the DVR is also advantageous for molecules with more than three atoms. We use a basis of products of Wigner functions (for rotation) and DVR functions (for vibration). A key advantage of the DVR is the fact that one can prune the basis: many DVR functions can be discarded from the original direct product basis. This significantly reduces the cost of the calculation. We have implemented a mapping procedure to exploit this prune-ability. We explain how to treat Coriolis terms in a parity-adapted basis. The method is tested by computing rovibrational levels of HFCO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it