MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970877762 · doi:10.1086/367949

The Role of Energy Availability in Mammalian Hibernation: An Experimental Test in Free‐Ranging Eastern Chipmunks

2003· article· en· W1970877762 on OpenAlexaff
Murray M. Humphries, Donald L. Kramer, Donald W. Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysiological and Biochemical Zoology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTorporHibernation (computing)BiologyEcologyThermoregulationZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reduced torpor expression by hibernating mammals is often attributed to physiological constraints that limit their hibernation ability but may instead reflect adaptive, plastic responses to surplus energy availability. We evaluated this hypothesis by supplementing the food hoards of free-ranging eastern chipmunks (Tamias striatus) before hibernation and then documenting their use of torpor during the subsequent winter. In both years of study, chipmunks that received additional food were euthermic more than twice as frequently as nonsupplemented individuals. Furthermore, when food-supplemented individuals did express torpor, their minimum collar temperature was 5 degrees -10 degrees C warmer than nonsupplemented animals. These results indicate that reduced torpor expression by hibernators can result from an absence of energetic necessity rather than a lack of physiological capability and suggest that even endotherms sequestered in a hibernaculum may benefit from maintaining an elevated body temperature whenever possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations115
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysiological and Biochemical ZoologySame topicBat Biology and Ecology StudiesFrench-language works237,207