Real time breast microwave radar image reconstruction using circular holography: A study of experimental feasibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to assess the experimental feasibility of a novel breast microwave radar reconstruction approach, circular holography, using realistic experimental datasets recorded using a preclinical experimental setup. The performance of this approach was quantitatively evaluated by calculating the signal to noise ratio, contrast to noise ratio, spatial accuracy, and reconstruction time. METHODS: Six datasets were recorded, three corresponding to fatty cases and three containing synthetic dense tissue structures. Five of these datasets contained an 8 mm inclusion that emulated a malignant lesion. The data were acquired from synthetic phantoms that mimic the dielectric properties of breast tissues in the 1-6 GHz range using a custom experimental breast microwave radar system. The spatial accuracy and signal to noise ratio of the reconstructed was calculated for all the reconstructed images. The contrast to noise ratio of the reconstructed images corresponding to the datasets containing fibroglandular tissue regions was determined. This was done to evaluate the ability of the circular holographic method to provide images in which the responses from tumors can be distinguished from adjacent dense tissue structures. The execution time required to form the images was also measured to evaluate the data throughput of the holographic approach. RESULTS: For all the reconstructed datasets, the location of the synthetic tumors in the experimental setup was consistent with its position in the reconstructed image. The average spatial error was 2.2 mm, which is less than half the spatial resolution of the data acquisition system. The average signal to noise ratio of the reconstructed images containing an artificial malignant lesion was 8.5 dB, while the average contrast to noise ratio was 6.7 dB. The reconstructed images presented no artifacts. The average execution time of the images formed using the proposed approach was 5 ms, which is six orders of magnitude faster than current state of the art breast microwave radar (BMR) reconstruction algorithms. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that circular holography is capable of forming accurate images with signal to noise levels higher than 8 dB in quasi real time. Compared to BMR reconstruction algorithms tested on datasets containing dense tissue structures, the holographic approach generated images of similar spatial accuracy with higher signal to noise ratios and an acceleration factor of one order of magnitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".