MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970929766 · doi:10.1080/21681376.2014.962595

An innovative technique for modelling impacts of coastal storm damage

2014· article· en· W1970929766 on OpenAlexaffabout
Maxwell Hartt

Bibliographic record

VenueRegional Studies Regional Science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStorm surgeFlooding (psychology)StormEnvironmental scienceCoastal floodGeographic information systemMeteorologyClimatologyGeographyOceanographyGeologyCartographySea level riseClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A spatial–temporal model is developed to model the impacts of simulated coastal region storm surge and flooding using a combined spatial mapping and system dynamics approach. By coupling geographic information systems and system dynamics, the interconnecting components of the spatial–temporal model are used with historical data to evaluate storm damage. The model examines the component-wise changes to the physical environment, community infrastructure and socioeconomic resources from simulated storm surges. To illustrate this model, the research is applied to the case of Charlottetown on Prince Edward Island, Canada, a vulnerable coastal city subject to considerable impacts from increasingly frequent severe storm surges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.380
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegional Studies Regional ScienceSame topicFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207