Conformational Stability of the Propylene Oxide−Water Adduct: Direct Spectroscopic Detection of O−H···O Hydrogen Bonded Conformers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 1:1 molecular adduct of propylene oxide and water (PO-H(2)O) was studied using Fourier transform microwave spectroscopy and high level ab initio methods. Two distinct structural conformers with the water molecule acting as a proton donor were detected experimentally: one with the water on the same side as the methyl group with respect to the ether ring, i.e., syn-PO-H(2)O, the other with the water molecule binding to the O-atom from the opposite side of the methyl group, i.e., anti-PO-H(2)O. The nonbonded hydrogen is entgegen to the ether ring in both conformers. Rotational spectra of four isotopic species, namely PO-H(2)O, PO-DOH, PO-HOD, and PO-D(2)O, were recorded for the two conformers. The hydrogen bond parameters: r(O(epoxy)...H), angle(ring-O(epoxy)...H), and angle(O(epoxy)...H-O) are 1.908 A, 112 degrees, and 177 degrees for syn-PO-H(2)O, and 1.885 A, 104.3 degrees, and 161.7 degrees for anti-PO-H(2)O, respectively. The experimental results suggest that the hydrogen bond in syn-PO-H(2)O is stronger and the monomer subunits are more rigidly locked in their positions than in the ethylene oxide-water adduct. The stabilizing effect of the methyl group to the intermolecular hydrogen bond is discussed in terms of the experimentally estimated binding energies, the structural parameters, and the ab initio calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".