MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970958330 · doi:10.1017/s0025727300000521

From the “Silent Killer” to the “Whispering Disease”: Ovarian Cancer and the Uses of Metaphor

2009· article· en· W1970958330 on OpenAlexaff
Patricia Jasen

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical History · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmpathy and Medical Education
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetaphorComputer scienceAction (physics)World Wide WebContent (measure theory)LinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Pulitzer Prize winning play by Margaret Edson, entitled W;t, begins with an exchange between an oncologist, Dr Harvey Kelekian, and his patient, a John Donne scholar and professor of English named Vivian Bearing.He is in the process of informing her that she has stage 4 ovarian cancer: KELEKIAN: You have cancer . . .you have advanced, metastatic ovarian cancer.VIVIAN: Go on .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.030
Scholarly communication0.0070.009
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical HistorySame topicEmpathy and Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207