MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970974748 · doi:10.3917/riges.384.0082

Comment transmettre l'entreprise familiale à plusieurs enfants ?

2014· article· fr· W1970974748 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Luis Cisneros, Bérangère Deschamps

Bibliographic record

VenueGestion · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFamily Business Performance and Succession
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transmettre son entreprise à tous ses enfants peut sembler la solution rêvée pour un dirigeant, dans la mesure où ces derniers sont compétents et volontaires. Mais la manière de procéder n’est pas si simple : s’agit-il de transférer de manière égale la propriété et la direction ? Comment le prédécesseur transmet-il l’entreprise à plusieurs successeurs ? Comment ces successeurs s’organisent-ils pour diriger ensemble l’entreprise ? Cet article décrit les difficultés qu’une telle situation entraîne, illustre celles-ci au moyen de neuf minicas et propose cinq conseils susceptibles d’aider les praticiens, les consultants et les dirigeants d’entreprise à optimiser le succès de tels transferts d’entreprise à plusieurs membres d’une fratrie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestionSame topicFamily Business Performance and SuccessionFrench-language works237,207