Theoretical investigations of charge carrier transport in organic semiconductors of naphthalene bisimides N-substituted with alkoxyphenyl groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three novel alkoxyphenyl N-substituted naphthalene bisimide derivatives, N,N′-bis(4-n-butoxyphenyl)-1,8:4,5-naphthalenetetracarboxylic (NBI1), N,N′-bis(4-n-hexyloxyphenyl)-1,8:4,5-naphthalenetetracarboxylic (NBI2), and N,N′-bis(4-n-octyloxyphenyl)-1,8:4,5-naphthalenetetracarboxylic (NBI3) as potential organic semiconductors, have been investigated using density functional theory calculations coupled with the incoherent charge-hopping model at the molecular and crystal levels. The calculated results demonstrate that the low-lying and delocalized LUMOs and larger adiabatic electron affinities of these compounds are beneficial to their stability when acting as n-type organic semiconductors. The reorganization energy and transfer integral can significantly influence the charge carrier mobility. The compounds featured with the small reorganization energy and large transfer integral have relatively high charge mobilities. The electron coupling among the dominant hopping pathways indicates that the charge-transport processes happen in the parallel dimer of neighboring molecules with π–π interaction. The investigation of the angle dependence of charge carrier mobility showed that both NBI1 and NBI3 crystals exhibit remarkable anisotropic charge transporting behaviors. The calculated absorption spectra by the time-dependent density functional theory revealed that the strongest absorption peaks in the visible region are assigned to the π → π* transition and these peaks are regulated by the transitions of HOMO → LUMO. The calculated electron mobilities of NBI1, NBI2, and NBI3 are 0.0365, 0.0312, and 0.0801 cm2 V–1 s–1, respectively, indicating that these compounds are suitable for n-type organic semiconductors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".