MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1970994400 · doi:10.1109/jssc.2012.2214182

A CMOS-Microfluidic Chemiluminescence Contact Imaging Microsystem

2012· article· en· W1970994400 on OpenAlexafffund
Ritu Raj Singh, Lian Leng, Axel Güenther, Roman Genov

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanowire Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCMC MicrosystemsMassachusetts Institute of Technology
KeywordsCMOSMicrosystemPixelComputer scienceMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A hybrid CMOS-microfluidic microsystem for chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence-based biochemical sensing is presented. The microsystem integrates a two-layer soft polymer microfluidic network and a CMOS imager fabricated in a standard 0.35-$\mu$m technology. The CMOS imager consists of a 64$\,\times\,$128-pixel array interdigitated with a 32$\,\times\,$64 electrolessly plated nickel–gold microelectrode array. A two-transistor reset path technique attenuates the subthreshold leakage current of the reset transistor which constitutes a significant portion of the dark current. An active reset technique, in-pixel flicker noise cancellation, and pixel binning contribute to noise reduction. The imager achieves a low dark current of 3.6 nA/cm$^{2}$for photodiode reset voltages as high as 2.3 V, noise of 110$\mu$Vrms with maximum time of photon integration of 90 s, and a dynamic range of 67.8 dB. The CMOS-microfluidic microsystem is validated in on-chip chemiluminescence and electrochemiluminescence detection of luminol.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Solid-State CircuitsSame topicNanowire Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207